Context

Context

Context

Ongoing

Volunteer

UX Research

Competitor Analysis

Quantitative

Survey

Data analysis

Presentation

Workshops

Roles

Workshop mediator

UX Research

UX Strategy

Mediadora

UX Research

UX Strategy

Team

4 Designers

1 Scrum Master

2 Product Managers

Timeline

Workshop: 2 days

Research: 7 days

Analysis: 4 days

Bora Rachar

Bora Rachar

Bora Rachar

When I joined the team, the initial pitch was to create a platform for sharing subscriptions, such as streaming services, video courses, apps and the like.

During a meeting led by the Product Managers, the design team brought everyone’s attention to the recent changes made to internal policies of streaming companies, which forbade sharing accounts, a fact that would make the initial idea unfeasible.

Thus, it was proposed, also by the design team, to conduct a market research to assess interest in a solution that would help sharing expenses in a more broad sense, not focused on subscriptions related to services and licensed content, as initially focused.

When I joined the team, the initial pitch was to create a platform for sharing subscriptions, such as streaming services, video courses, apps and the like.

During a meeting led by the Product Managers, the design team brought everyone’s attention to the recent changes made to internal policies of streaming companies, which forbade sharing accounts, a fact that would make the initial idea unfeasible.

Thus, it was proposed, also by the design team, to conduct a market research to assess interest in a solution that would help sharing expenses in a more broad sense, not focused on subscriptions related to services and licensed content, as initially focused.

When I joined the team, the initial pitch was to create a platform for sharing subscriptions, such as streaming services, video courses, apps and the like.

During a meeting led by the Product Managers, the design team brought everyone’s attention to the recent changes made to internal policies of streaming companies, which forbade sharing accounts, a fact that would make the initial idea unfeasible.

Thus, it was proposed, also by the design team, to conduct a market research to assess interest in a solution that would help sharing expenses in a more broad sense, not focused on subscriptions related to services and licensed content, as initially focused.

When I joined the team, the initial pitch was to create a platform for sharing subscriptions, such as streaming services, video courses, apps and the like.

During a meeting led by the Product Managers, the design team brought everyone’s attention to the recent changes made to internal policies of streaming companies, which forbade sharing accounts, a fact that would make the initial idea unfeasible.

Thus, it was proposed, also by the design team, to conduct a market research to assess interest in a solution that would help sharing expenses in a more broad sense, not focused on subscriptions related to services and licensed content, as initially focused.

Tools

Tools

Tools

Figma (FigJam)

Google Docs

Google Sheets

Google Forms

Apple's Keynote

Competitor Analysis

Competitor Analysis

Competitor Analysis

Process

Process

Process

I was in charge of conducting a competitor analysis to get an idea of what the current market was like.

I found 2 big competitors and also evaluated two smaller products, that could bring good insights about features and practices that already worked for the market.

With this initial research, we were able to understand what would be our biggest challenges and our greatest opportunities.

Cumbuca

Cumbuca

Cumbuca

The Brazilian market has only one company that positions itself as a facilitator of expense sharing, Cumbuca, a digital bank that offers joint accounts. Unlike them, we would only be facilitators, not a complete digital bank.

Splitwise

Splitwise

Splitwise

Splitwise is an American company and the largest direct competitor of the new Bora Rachar. It provides all the features expected of a product in this field, but has relatively high cost and does not offer easily accessible support for Brazilian users.

We had space, but what about users?

We had space, but what about users?

We had space, but what about users?

The survey

The survey

The survey

Theme workshop

Theme workshop

Theme workshop

To answer this question, we initially opted for an online quantitative survey.

The week following the meeting that changed the focus of the project, I facilitated a workshop to define the what we wanted out of the survey, which themes would be addressed and which answers we expected to get. I led 3 other designers and a product manager.

Question ideation

Question ideation

Question ideation

With the general direction defined, we started ideating the questions themselves. I went through some articles on NNGroup for guidelines on user research and created questions related to the different themes chosen. I set up the questions on a Figjam board noting their type (open, closed, checkbox, likert scale…) and describing exactly what we wanted to achieve with them.

Refining

Refining

Refining

The following week, I facilitated another workshop to refine the questions proposed. I was joined by 3 other designers and 2 product managers. Through dot voting, we chose which questions would make the cut according to our own opinion of priority.

We decided not to follow with questions about interest in the product and monetization, because they represent more specific themes that would be better evaluated later stages of design and would have low impact at that moment.

We set the target of 100 responses to finish the survey and analyze the results.

The results

The results

The results

Visualizing

Visualizing

Visualizing

I separated the results into post-its and categorized all answers by popularity using traffic light colors, for easy viewing, and in pink, open answers provided by the participants.

It is worth mentioning that this process was only to facilitate the visualization. I always relied on the original results spreadsheet, which allowed the correlation and contextualization of the answers.

Categorizing

Categorizing

Categorizing

Then, for the open questions, where participants could write their opinions freely, I categorized them by common themes, obtaining a general overview of the most reported pain points.

Through this process, I discovered that the main issues were in 5 major categories: The division process itself, the proportionality or parity of the division, interpersonal problems, organization of payments made and charging people.

Em seguida, para as questões abertas, em que os participantes podiam escrever suas opiniões livremente, fiz a separação por temas em comum, obtendo um panorama geral dos pontos de dor mais relatados.
Através desse processo, descobri que as principais dores se encontravam em 5 grandes categorias: A divisão em si, a proporcionalidade ou paridade da divisão, problemas interpessoais, organização dos pagamentos e cobrança.

Analyzing

Analyzing

Analyzing

Once categorized, we conducted another dynamic, this time only for the design team, in order to extract the insights from the data collected.

We concluded that people did use to share expenses and that they did encounter difficulties when going through this process.

The presentation

The research was conducted and elaborated by the design team, with some validation by the product managers, but did not count with the development team and scrum master. Therefore, to facilitate the handoff of the results to the rest of the team, I set up a deck-style presentation to be held the following week.

Because it was conducted by design team, we decided that the presentation itself would be made by another designer, who acts as our lead. I held a validation meeting with him, to give the general idea I had for the flow of the presentation and we agreed on what would be presented to the team.

The research was conducted and elaborated by the design team, with some validation by the product managers, but did not count with the development team and scrum master. Therefore, to facilitate the handoff of the results to the rest of the team, I set up a deck-style presentation to be held the following week.

Because it was conducted by design team, we decided that the presentation itself would be made by another designer, who acts as our lead. I held a validation meeting with him, to give the general idea I had for the flow of the presentation and we agreed on what would be presented to the team.

Check out the presentation here

Check out the presentation here

Check out the presentation here

Check out the presentation here

Next steps

Next steps

Next steps

After the presentation, the team decided to continue the project. Because our activities began in the middle of November 2023, at the end of the process, we were already in the middle of December, close to the beginning of the year-end recess.

We agreed that the activities would return on January 8th, at which time the product team would start the discovery, roadmap and backlog of the project.

For the design team, we will continue with the elaboration of the persona and the proto-journey expected for the product. Our next activities will involve in-depth interviews with some of the participants of the survey and the subsequent elaboration of the artifacts that are based on this data, to be able to better understand the pain points of users and assist the product team in defining features and flows for the product.

Final thoughts

Final thoughts

Final thoughts

I am very grateful for the opportunity to participate in this project and the new Bora Rachar team. I learned a lot from the other members and the dynamics of a multidisciplinary team. As the product does not yet exist, I also had contact with the initial phases of design, and all the challenges that come with it, from the discovery of the problem and immersion in the user’s shoes, and in the case of Bora Rachar, the complete change of direction in the middle of the development cycle, because there were structures already made, created before I joined.

It was a very productive journey and I intend to continue in the project to have even more experiences and contact with more product design challenges.

I will update this page throughout the journey and I thank everyone who participated in it and also you who have read this far.